What Physicians Must Know Before Signing an Employment Contract

A physician employment contract does much more than outline your compensation. It can impact your referral relationships, billing exposure, future job opportunities, and even your medical license. Many of the most significant risks fall on you personally, not the employer. Understanding these issues before you sign is critical to protecting your career and financial future. This guide highlights the key provisions physicians should carefully review before signing, helping you approach negotiations with clarity and confidence rather than assumptions.

Even seemingly straightforward pay structures can create serious legal risks if your compensation is tied, directly or indirectly, to referral volume or value. Under Stark Law, physicians face strict liability; meaning intent doesn’t matter. Violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) can lead to criminal penalties and liability under the False Claims Act. Understanding these rules before signing a contract is essential to protect both your career and your financial future.

  • Bonuses or incentives tied to hospital, ancillary, or downstream revenue
  • Productivity credit for services you did not personally perform
  • Compensation above fair market value without clear justification
  • Income guarantees or RVU models that exceed collections or track referral value
  • Require compensation to be set in advance, fair market value, and commercially reasonable
  • Limit productivity pay to personally performed services only
  • Include written representations of Stark and AKS compliance
  • Require documentation supporting fair market value and commercial reasonableness

“In-system” referral requirements are common, but if they’re drafted without proper exceptions, they can create legal and ethical risks. Physicians must always retain the ability to respect patient preferences, insurance restrictions, and medical necessity.

  • Mandatory referral language without patient-preference or medical-necessity carveouts
  • Referral compliance tied to compensation or bonuses
  • Exclusivity clauses that restrict clinical judgment
  • Ensure referral directives include required exceptions
  • Confirm compensation is unaffected by referral patterns
  • Align contract language with professional ethical obligations

Non-competes, non-solicitation clauses, and no-hire provisions can significantly limit where and how you practice after leaving employment. Even where non-competes face increased scrutiny, many remain enforceable depending on state law.

  • Broad geographic restrictions or long durations
  • “De facto” non-competes through liquidated damages or repayment penalties
  • Restrictions triggered by employer-initiated termination
  • Negotiate removal of restrictive covenants where possible
  • Narrow scope to your actual practice area and limit duration
  • Carve out existing patients and telehealth
  • Prohibit enforcement after constructive or without-cause termination

Even when your employer handles billing, claims submitted under your name and National Provider Identifier (NPI) can expose you to repayment obligations and False Claims Act liability. Billing errors are rarely “just” an employer problem – if your NPI is on the claim, you can be held responsible too.

  • Contract language shifting all billing risk to you
  • No access to billing or coding records
  • Silence on responsibility for audits, overpayments, or defense costs
  • Require employer responsibility for billing compliance and refunds
  • Secure audit and record-access rights for claims under your NPI
  • Include employer-funded legal defense for audits tied to its billing practices

Certain contract triggers, like investigations or “for cause” termination, can result in reportable events that impact your medical license, hospital privileges, and records in the National Practitioner Data Bank. Vague or unclear language in these clauses can have consequences that follow you for your entire career.

  • Automatic termination or reporting based on allegations alone
  • Vague or subjective “for cause” definitions
  • Waivers of fair-hearing or due-process rights
  • Limit “for cause” to objective, material breaches
  • Require due process and access to counsel before adverse action
  • Obligate the employer to fund licensure and board defense
  • Avoid premature or unnecessary NPDB-triggering actions

Undefined obligations in a contract often expand over time. What may start as a manageable schedule can quickly become overwhelming if clear limits aren’t set. If extra duties aren’t linked to additional compensation, it can lead to burnout and uncompensated work.

  • “As assigned” call without caps
  • Unilateral changes to schedule, duties, or locations
  • Added supervision or cross-coverage without resources or pay
  • Clearly define call frequency, hours, locations, and scope
  • Tie additional duties to additional compensation
  • Require mutual consent for material changes

Most physician malpractice policies are claims-made, which means they only cover claims filed while the policy is active. When you leave a practice, tail coverage may be required to protect against claims arising from your prior work. Whether you or your employer pays for this coverage can have major financial implications.

  • Tail coverage automatically assigned to the physician
  • No distinction between for-cause and without-cause termination
  • Require employer-paid tail coverage except for proven misconduct
  • Specify coverage limits, carriers, and scope (including telehealth)

Overly broad intellectual property and exclusivity clauses can claim rights to your prior work or limit activities like teaching, research or consulting. Recognizing these restrictions before signing is critical to protecting your professional freedom and future opportunities.

  • IP definitions that include work created before employment
  • Blanket prohibitions on outside professional activity
  • Carve out pre-existing IP and work created on personal time
  • Require reasonable standards and timelines for approving outside activities

Value-based pay models can be appropriate, but only when the performance metrics are within your control and don’t create indirect incentives tied to referrals. Understanding these details before signing is essential to avoid legal risk and protect your professional integrity.

  • Metrics tied to referral volume or downstream revenue
  • Vague or unchallengeable performance standards
  • Ensure metrics are evidence-based and within your control
  • Confirm compliance with applicable Stark value-based exceptions
  • Preserve transparency and appeal rights

Physician employment contracts are legal risk documents, not just job offers. Even a “standard” agreement can expose you to regulatory liability, limit your future practice, or put your license at risk. Reviewing and negotiating your contract with experienced guidance is essential to protect your career and professional freedom. Schedule a free consultation with a Med Contract Law attorney today to review your contract and safeguard your future.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Physicians should consult qualified counsel regarding their specific contracts and applicable law.